Skip to main content

Focused Leadership

The concept of leadership is one that has been written about in thousands of books by thousands of people. There are dozens of styles of leaders, and dozens of titles for leaders. In businesses you have your CEO's, CFO's, COO's, CMO's, and all the way down the line to local managers. In schools you have your Superintendents, Principals, Vice Principals, Department Chairs, Coaches, etc... Governments the same idea. But who is right in all the ways to lead? Who in all those areas is really in charge?

The official leaders are the ones with the titles. But every level and every team has informal leaders the whole way through the chain. An effective team is going to have any variety of leaders, where some are thinkers, some are doers, some are supporters, some are creators, some bring opposing views as thought provokers, and often times these roles can change based on the situation.

The best organizations, no matter the field, have focused leadership. Study Steve Jobs saying no to hundreds of ongoing ideas and project at Apple. Walgreens focusing on having stores on easily accessible street corners ("the corner of health and happiness") so people can quickly and easily get in and out. Read Good to Great or any other book by Jim Collins to see that all the companies that separated themselves successfully (Best Buy vs Circuit City, Netflix vs Blockbuster) focused on being the best in the world at ONE thing, and not spreading themselves too thin.

The best leaders are able to bring the focus of the organization to their core values and purpose, and guide everyone into making decisions that fit that focus. They are also able to realize when the organization is veering off course, and working with their teams to determine if values and purpose have shifted and its time to adapt, or if it is time to reign things in and refocus the organization.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Vulnerability

I cannot claim to be an expert on vulnerability, that title belongs to Brene Brown. Through her work, I have learned that being vulnerable is key to major breakthroughs in life. The opposite of this is true as well. Being unwilling to take risks, fearing failure or embarrassment, leads to stilted growth and eventual regression. The unwillingness to struggle in the short term leads to eventual major disappointment. That struggle is unpleasant, painful, draining, aggravating, defeating, and necessary. As a teacher, vulnerability arises when teaching a new grade level or content area. It happens when a re-designed lesson is taught for the first time, a new resource is used, and when being observed. Leaders face vulnerability when launching a new initiative and taking questions from stakeholders. Coaches face vulnerability when they meet with a new client or a client who operates outside the coach's wheelhouse of knowledge or skills. Humans are adept at procrastinating, which is a phys...

Navigating Uncertainty

One thing most people can agree on in early April 2024 is that no one knows what to expect right now. Federal agencies are being closed at a record pace, tariffs are rocking global finances, AI is changing faster than most people can keep up with, everyone has an opinion on this, and no one can anticipate what might happen next. The stock market is a prime example of the uncertainty, and on the day I started writing this the Dow Jones surged by 800 points and ultimately fell by 600. Today as I continue writing, it rose by nearly 3000 points. There are countless ways to reach when life becomes chaotic. Some people "don't look up" as the movie's title states, because as long as you can't see the asteroid heading straight towards you it does not exist. Some like to lean into the chaos, acting like Loki, the Norse god of mischief and disruption. Others protest through marches, speeches, and boycotts. All of these are human reactions on which I place no judgment. Based...

Scheduling - A School's Heuristic Problem

Students learn about algorithms in Computer Science to solve complex problems in reasonable times. Some issues are too complex even for the best algorithms to perfectly solve, and those are known as heuristics. The example commonly used is the traveling salesman. While a little outdated, and I have updated the example to be the logistics of UPS delivering packages, the story goes like this.  A traveling salesman arrives in a new town intending to get to each house in the most efficient path possible. They get a road map of all the homes they will visit and their hotel room and start mapping out paths. The math works out to show the following: Let's nerd out for a moment. Each number of possible paths is the mathematical factorial of the number of homes on the path. So 3 homes means 3*2*1 = 6 paths. 7 homes means 7*6*5*4*3*2*1 = 5040 homes. Just 10 homes, and we are at 10 factorial or 3,682,800 pathways! How can one possibly solve for the best route with that many choices? It is too...