Skip to main content

Building a team

 There is nothing more important than having the right team for leveraging success. Even the greatest "individual" accomplishments were never done in isolation. A team should be a collection of people working together from a common purpose towards a common goal. That sounds like it should not be that hard, considering most teams are put together with people that have chosen to be at that place and do that activity. But, humans are human! Ego, pride, biases, past experiences, hidden agendas, and all kinds of other issues get in the way of teams being successful.

The first administrative team I was on had 5 people on it. Three of us were all in on the mission, ready to tackle issues and have difficult conversations to make change. One was close to retirement, so really was just coasting out the last couple of years and not willing to do much of anything. And one publicly to the team was on board, but privately to key people we were trying to lead would undermine us at every turn. That one individual fostered so much animosity between the staff and the leadership that is was a daily grind just to make it through the day, and change was impossible. After a year of this, thankfully that person was relieved of their duties, I took their spot, we hired an excellent new team member, and we took off.

Another team that was a leadership level above mine was constructed of all like minded individuals, and went along with whatever idea the boss came up with. A team full of "yes" people, without someone willing to play devil's advocate, leads to ideas that are not fully vetted, with plenty of holes. This leads to confusion on many levels, people needing to go back, re-communicate, alter plans, try to save face, and lose both leadership and personal capital each time this happens. Teams need someone that will challenge the thoughts in a respectful manner, bring different viewpoints to think through unintended consequences, and come to a complete and full resolution that will truly achieve the mission. A team of people that only agree with the boss will make that person feel like the smartest person on the planet, but lead them to making a series of bad decisions.

The last team I was a part of, which is starting over with 40% of the team being new, was incredible. We understood the mission from the top two, who worked incredibly closely and would openly question their plans with each other before bringing them to the team for more open conversation. The team all developed into friends that trust each other, and welcomed each others viewpoints. Changes or modifications were seen as positives, not challenges to anyones intelligence or authority. The plans we rolled out lead to positive change because they were thoroughly vetted and then well communicated. Without meaning to, we really had a "yes, and" mentality. I believe we have hired excellent people to fill the roles, and that this team will move forward in much the same manner.

A team must have diversity, and those viewpoints must be all welcomed, acknowledged, and leveraged. Coming from a place of asset based beliefs, and recognizing that diversifying your team, just like an investment portfolio, is the best way to maximize growth and minimize risk.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Vulnerability

I cannot claim to be an expert on vulnerability, that title belongs to Brene Brown. Through her work, I have learned that being vulnerable is key to major breakthroughs in life. The opposite of this is true as well. Being unwilling to take risks, fearing failure or embarrassment, leads to stilted growth and eventual regression. The unwillingness to struggle in the short term leads to eventual major disappointment. That struggle is unpleasant, painful, draining, aggravating, defeating, and necessary. As a teacher, vulnerability arises when teaching a new grade level or content area. It happens when a re-designed lesson is taught for the first time, a new resource is used, and when being observed. Leaders face vulnerability when launching a new initiative and taking questions from stakeholders. Coaches face vulnerability when they meet with a new client or a client who operates outside the coach's wheelhouse of knowledge or skills. Humans are adept at procrastinating, which is a phys...

Navigating Uncertainty

One thing most people can agree on in early April 2024 is that no one knows what to expect right now. Federal agencies are being closed at a record pace, tariffs are rocking global finances, AI is changing faster than most people can keep up with, everyone has an opinion on this, and no one can anticipate what might happen next. The stock market is a prime example of the uncertainty, and on the day I started writing this the Dow Jones surged by 800 points and ultimately fell by 600. Today as I continue writing, it rose by nearly 3000 points. There are countless ways to reach when life becomes chaotic. Some people "don't look up" as the movie's title states, because as long as you can't see the asteroid heading straight towards you it does not exist. Some like to lean into the chaos, acting like Loki, the Norse god of mischief and disruption. Others protest through marches, speeches, and boycotts. All of these are human reactions on which I place no judgment. Based...

Scheduling - A School's Heuristic Problem

Students learn about algorithms in Computer Science to solve complex problems in reasonable times. Some issues are too complex even for the best algorithms to perfectly solve, and those are known as heuristics. The example commonly used is the traveling salesman. While a little outdated, and I have updated the example to be the logistics of UPS delivering packages, the story goes like this.  A traveling salesman arrives in a new town intending to get to each house in the most efficient path possible. They get a road map of all the homes they will visit and their hotel room and start mapping out paths. The math works out to show the following: Let's nerd out for a moment. Each number of possible paths is the mathematical factorial of the number of homes on the path. So 3 homes means 3*2*1 = 6 paths. 7 homes means 7*6*5*4*3*2*1 = 5040 homes. Just 10 homes, and we are at 10 factorial or 3,682,800 pathways! How can one possibly solve for the best route with that many choices? It is too...