Skip to main content

Directive vs Supportive Coaching

One art of coaching is knowing when to direct, guide, and get out of the way. Initially, I thought the coaching style related to the client's experience. Novice educators would need their hands held and told what to do, while veteran staff would have the big picture and a robust toolbox and just need a nudge in one direction or another. It only took a few interactions to realize this was a gross generalization. Experience matters, but much more nuance is needed.

Some new teachers come in incredibly prepared, with parents who were educators and sound pre-teaching training. It's hard to believe that after a couple of months on the job, they aren't a decade into the classroom. Some veteran teachers seem like they never learn enough to progress independently, and after 20 years of teaching, it's more like they have had 20 first years. In some circumstances, the teacher has ample knowledge and skills but cannot determine which tool is the right one to do the job. In others, the teacher faces a brand new challenge and needs to learn from scratch.

Successful coaches can suss out the right approach for their clients based on the available evidence. What stage in this endeavor has the client arrived at? How much background knowledge does the client already have? How clear are they on the lesson's goals? How frustrated is the client, and what timeframe do they have to reach a solution? The answers to these questions provide the initial data to ascertain an opening technique. 

Limited background knowledge, minimal time, and/or high frustration levels, and the coach needs to step in and directly problem-solve. Solid experience, ample time, or low frustration/high curiosity, and the coach needs to guide the teacher's exploration. The wrong approach will surely backfire, as a slow supportive technique to the first situation will cause the teacher to throw up their hands in disgust and leave, vowing to figure it out themselves. Giving the answer to the teacher in the second scenario will disempower them and keep them from fully exploring how the idea will best work in their classes.

Starting any coaching session by finding out the current capabilities and capacity of the client is always a great starting point. Responding to this information appropriately leads to successful coaching sessions. And the technique at the onset of the meeting may change as the session goes on. Flowing back and forth between directive and supportive is often the best way to build motivation and skill through coaching. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Vulnerability

I cannot claim to be an expert on vulnerability, that title belongs to Brene Brown. Through her work, I have learned that being vulnerable is key to major breakthroughs in life. The opposite of this is true as well. Being unwilling to take risks, fearing failure or embarrassment, leads to stilted growth and eventual regression. The unwillingness to struggle in the short term leads to eventual major disappointment. That struggle is unpleasant, painful, draining, aggravating, defeating, and necessary. As a teacher, vulnerability arises when teaching a new grade level or content area. It happens when a re-designed lesson is taught for the first time, a new resource is used, and when being observed. Leaders face vulnerability when launching a new initiative and taking questions from stakeholders. Coaches face vulnerability when they meet with a new client or a client who operates outside the coach's wheelhouse of knowledge or skills. Humans are adept at procrastinating, which is a phys...

Navigating Uncertainty

One thing most people can agree on in early April 2024 is that no one knows what to expect right now. Federal agencies are being closed at a record pace, tariffs are rocking global finances, AI is changing faster than most people can keep up with, everyone has an opinion on this, and no one can anticipate what might happen next. The stock market is a prime example of the uncertainty, and on the day I started writing this the Dow Jones surged by 800 points and ultimately fell by 600. Today as I continue writing, it rose by nearly 3000 points. There are countless ways to reach when life becomes chaotic. Some people "don't look up" as the movie's title states, because as long as you can't see the asteroid heading straight towards you it does not exist. Some like to lean into the chaos, acting like Loki, the Norse god of mischief and disruption. Others protest through marches, speeches, and boycotts. All of these are human reactions on which I place no judgment. Based...

Scheduling - A School's Heuristic Problem

Students learn about algorithms in Computer Science to solve complex problems in reasonable times. Some issues are too complex even for the best algorithms to perfectly solve, and those are known as heuristics. The example commonly used is the traveling salesman. While a little outdated, and I have updated the example to be the logistics of UPS delivering packages, the story goes like this.  A traveling salesman arrives in a new town intending to get to each house in the most efficient path possible. They get a road map of all the homes they will visit and their hotel room and start mapping out paths. The math works out to show the following: Let's nerd out for a moment. Each number of possible paths is the mathematical factorial of the number of homes on the path. So 3 homes means 3*2*1 = 6 paths. 7 homes means 7*6*5*4*3*2*1 = 5040 homes. Just 10 homes, and we are at 10 factorial or 3,682,800 pathways! How can one possibly solve for the best route with that many choices? It is too...