Skip to main content

Ownership

Ownership is something I value as a critical character trait. Admittedly, I took too many decades to come around to this idea. Like many kids, I quickly said, "It wasn't me!" or "I don't know!" when any idiot observing could clearly see it was me and I did know. But I felt it was my way of deflecting ownership and mitigating the consequences coming my way. Over and over, I would use this tactic when I had not been caught red-handed. It worked from the point of avoiding the worst of some consequences in the short term, but in the long term, I was eroding trust and relationships.

Once I came to grips with the fact that the short-term pain of owning my mistakes led to my own growth as a human, faster restoration of relationships, and quicker resolution of the issue, I worked to change my habits. It is still easier to try and avoid the inevitable immediate disappointment, but knowing the benefits of admitting my mistake, I now default to honesty and openness. The usual response to someone owning their error is one of acceptance, appreciation, and problem-solving. It is always embarrassing to be caught making a mistake, but it is even more devastating to adamantly deny something only to be found guilty later. The amount of arguments I could have mitigated or avoided if I had just owned up in the first place is way bigger than I would like to admit.

Former Navy Seal commander and now best-selling author, speaker, and consultant Jocko Willink quite literally wrote the book on Ownership. He states, "Ownership happens when failures are owned, egos are forgotten, and pride is set aside." The opening paragraphs of this post speak to the first phrase in Willink's quote. "Egos are forgotten, and pride is set aside" speaks to the other side of ownership.

In trying to save our own hide, we quickly throw someone else in the path of the oncoming train. We choose this to not have to admit we made mistakes and have our reputations will be damaged. That does not change the fact that mistakes were made, and the truth will come out. Then, reputations are destroyed.

On top of that, the solution to what went wrong is likely faulty since the full picture of the true problem cannot be seen. The downstream effects of making decisions from bad data can become disastrous. The wrong programs or people can be eliminated or initiated. People's lives can be permanently changed for all the wrong reasons. The guilt of this only compounds the initial mistake.

The other side of ownership for leaders is not taking credit for their team's success. That praise needs to go to the people who worked on the solution. When a leader owns a team's success without crediting the team, they alienate their best people. Those people will no longer want to be a part of the team, and the team gets weaker with each defector. The leader becomes isolated, in which case they are no longer a leader. Or they are leading with the wrong people because the right people won't work with them, and their victories will become fewer and fewer. Either way, the leader is destined to fail.

Own the bad to take heat off the team, and praise the team for the good. This builds trust, a following from others, and a continuously improving organization. Any leader who doesn't strive for those outcomes is no leader I want to associate with.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Vulnerability

I cannot claim to be an expert on vulnerability, that title belongs to Brene Brown. Through her work, I have learned that being vulnerable is key to major breakthroughs in life. The opposite of this is true as well. Being unwilling to take risks, fearing failure or embarrassment, leads to stilted growth and eventual regression. The unwillingness to struggle in the short term leads to eventual major disappointment. That struggle is unpleasant, painful, draining, aggravating, defeating, and necessary. As a teacher, vulnerability arises when teaching a new grade level or content area. It happens when a re-designed lesson is taught for the first time, a new resource is used, and when being observed. Leaders face vulnerability when launching a new initiative and taking questions from stakeholders. Coaches face vulnerability when they meet with a new client or a client who operates outside the coach's wheelhouse of knowledge or skills. Humans are adept at procrastinating, which is a phys...

Navigating Uncertainty

One thing most people can agree on in early April 2024 is that no one knows what to expect right now. Federal agencies are being closed at a record pace, tariffs are rocking global finances, AI is changing faster than most people can keep up with, everyone has an opinion on this, and no one can anticipate what might happen next. The stock market is a prime example of the uncertainty, and on the day I started writing this the Dow Jones surged by 800 points and ultimately fell by 600. Today as I continue writing, it rose by nearly 3000 points. There are countless ways to reach when life becomes chaotic. Some people "don't look up" as the movie's title states, because as long as you can't see the asteroid heading straight towards you it does not exist. Some like to lean into the chaos, acting like Loki, the Norse god of mischief and disruption. Others protest through marches, speeches, and boycotts. All of these are human reactions on which I place no judgment. Based...

Scheduling - A School's Heuristic Problem

Students learn about algorithms in Computer Science to solve complex problems in reasonable times. Some issues are too complex even for the best algorithms to perfectly solve, and those are known as heuristics. The example commonly used is the traveling salesman. While a little outdated, and I have updated the example to be the logistics of UPS delivering packages, the story goes like this.  A traveling salesman arrives in a new town intending to get to each house in the most efficient path possible. They get a road map of all the homes they will visit and their hotel room and start mapping out paths. The math works out to show the following: Let's nerd out for a moment. Each number of possible paths is the mathematical factorial of the number of homes on the path. So 3 homes means 3*2*1 = 6 paths. 7 homes means 7*6*5*4*3*2*1 = 5040 homes. Just 10 homes, and we are at 10 factorial or 3,682,800 pathways! How can one possibly solve for the best route with that many choices? It is too...